Skip to main content

A Comment Conundrum

While we were walking downtown recently looking for signs of fall and useful print, a man on the street made a comment that caught me off guard.

"Those are some well-disciplined children!"

Now, if you had asked me, I would have said they are disciplined. I also would have said they know what to do and we work well together. They know how to be safe in the road, we went out at a time when they weren't yet hungry or tired so they had the brainpower to follow street safety rules and staying to the sides of the road.

Undoubtedly the man was commenting on the children between me and my assistant (I was up front holding hands with the two youngest walkers, then there was a preschooler sandwich of four children paired up holding hands, then my assistant pushing the stroller with four infants and toddlers) who were walking carefully and safely.

I have argued before that we should be using the term "discipline" rather than guidance, because of it's stress on the internal work on the child (or adult) who is disciplined enough to act in a manner that might be contrary to impulses or immediate rewards. But somehow the phrase "well-disciplined" got under my skin.

Did this man think I had trained them like sled-dogs to get them to walk in their lines? Did we look like task masters, ready to act on a child running or heading too close to the road? Did he have the same idea that I do, and he just happened to fit an age demographic that made me assume he was equating punishment and discipline?

I'm going to keep thinking on this. Please give me any insight you may have!

Comments

  1. UnknownNovember 5, 2016 at 3:30 PM

    You make an interesting point in differentiating between "disciplined" and "well-disciplined", and I think you are correct in that the former is internal and the latter is external. I would tend to think that the man is older, again agreeing with you that his generation equates discipline with punishment. (I myself was raised with the philosophy that "children should be seen and not heard", along with other tactics of the time to enforce submission and obedience.) Ultimately, he paid a compliment to you and not the children. Your methodology, of which he is oblivious, deserves the compliment, and the children deserve acknowledgement as well for their (self) discipline.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Ornamental People

Imagine you're in bed, about to fall asleep. Your significant other is cuddled up to you (or on the other side of the bed, maybe you prefer a little space), your blankets are right where you need them, and you can barely keep your eyes open; not that you want to. Suddenly, your neighbor walks in. You're on good terms with your neighbor, but they're not your best friend or anything. Why are they in your room? Even more to the point, why are they stroking your hair and telling you how old and fat you're getting? This is rapidly encroaching on illegal, right? Why is this socially acceptable to do to people who can't speak up to protest? Why are there people who feel the need to pick up, pat the head, or tickle the feet of every small child they encounter? Why are strangers more willing to touch a strange baby than a strange dog? It seems to come back to the image of the child, and the idea that they are less human and more ornamental. It takes a perspective shi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sit Down and Shut Up!

As an advocate for viewing children as competent, whole humans, I spend a lot of time reflecting on how to ensure the children get that message from what I say and do with them. It turns out the best way I've found so far to convey this is to sit on my hands and bite my tongue. Now, of course, those hands have plenty of uses, turning pages, fetching necessary supplies, providing endless hugs and "uppy"s, but when a child is engaged in a project, it is my job to keep those same hands as far away as possible. When the Duplo block is not pushed all the way onto the one below it, would it be simple and nearly unnoticeable to push it the rest of the way while the child was searching for the next piece? Of course. But if I did that, the child would miss out on the chance to notice it themself, and either correct it or not. By not correcting, that child will learn One way that structure is susceptible to outside forces like gravity.  To notice where the structure broke, wh...
Post a Comment
Read more

Well, Duh.

 Friday afternoon, I walked back into my classroom to a scene that is not unusual in any group of young children. One child had just hit another (both three years old), attempting to get a coveted toy. I walked over to the two, and as I always do, I looked at the crying child who had been hit and said, "Wow, it looks like Y is really hurting." Then, I recognized that wasn't the whole picture, and looked at the child who had hit (this time), who was already averting their eyes, and said, "It looks like A is hurting too." A turned around, stunned at my ability to perceive what was obvious to them. This time, at least. "Yeah!" They exclaimed. Y stopped crying and looked at A. I offered hugs to both, and attempted to sportscast what I saw. "A wanted that toy, and Y had it! Y didn't want to be hit." A looked at Y, and said, "Yeah, and I really wanted the truck, but I didn't want to hurt you." Both children found a spot i...
Post a Comment
Read more